Depressive disorder and psychosocial indicators in high school and college students from Mexico City: data from two censuses / Trastorno depresivo e indicadores psicosociales en estudiantes de bachillerato y de licenciatura de la Ciudad de México: datos de dos censos

Abstract Introduction Almost 5% of the Mexican general population (18-65 years old) has suffered depression once in their lives, and 2% of them more than once without receiving treatment. Objetive To measure the prevalence of depressive disorder and to calculate its relationship with psychosocial indicators. Method Data were collected through two censuses with high school and college students from a university in Mexico City (n = 116 214). Participants completed the CES-D and other scales. Multivariate logistic regression models were used. Results The prevalence of depressive disorder was 16%. Predictors of depressive disorder were: having suffered psychological or sexual violence, having a family member who had been injured during an assault, history of depression in the family, poor quality in family and social relationships, among others. Discussion and conclusion The prevalence of depressive disorder increases with age. As prevention and treatment at an early age are essential, intervention and monitoring strategies must be created and systematized taking gender and other elements into account, such as the relationship with the parents, violence, and a history of depression in the family.

Resumen Introducción Casi el 5% de la población general de México (18-65 años) ha sufrido depresión una vez en su vida y 2% la ha sufrido más de una vez sin haber recibido tratamiento. Objetivo Medir la prevalencia del trastorno depresivo y calcular su relación con algunos indicadores psicosociales. Método Los datos fueron recolectados por medio de dos censos con estudiantes de bachillerato y de licenciatura en la Ciudad de México (n = 116 214). Los participantes completaron el CES-D y otras escalas. Se usaron modelos de regresión logística multivariable. Resultados La prevalencia del trastorno depresivo fue del 16%. Los predictores del trastorno depresivo fueron: haber sufrido violencia psicológica o sexual, tener un miembro de la familia que hubíera sido herido durante un asalto, antecedentes de depresión en la familia, mala calidad en las relaciones familiares y sociales, entre otros. Discusión y conclusión La prevalencia del trastorno depresivo aumenta con la edad. Como la prevención y el tratamiento a una edad temprana son esenciales, se deben crear y sistematizar estrategias de intervención y monitoreo que tomen en cuenta el género y otros elementos, como la relación con los padres, violencia e historia de depresión en la familia.

Depresión y consumo de alcohol y tabaco en estudiantes de bachillerato y licenciatura / Depression and alcohol consumption and tobacco in high school and undergraduate

Depression is an emotional upset that disrupts the psycho-affective sphere and is associated with different risk behaviors, as alcohol and tobacco use, among young people. The aim of this study is to analyze the differences on depression in four groups of high school and college students (1. alcohol users, 2. tobacco users, 3. alcohol and tobacco non-users, and 4. alcohol and tobacco users). A census was conducted with 116 214 students with a mean age of 15 and 19 years. Heavy alcohol and tobacco use was more frequent in men. A factorial ANOVA analysis was used to compare depressive symptoms between heavy drinkers (4 or more drinks per occasion) and heavy smokers (4 or more cigarettes per day) by sex and school level. More depressive symptoms were found in college students (M = 9.7) than in the high school ones (M = 9.5, p<0.05). The group of alcohol and tobacco users showed higher levels of depressive symptoms (M=11.3) than the alcohol only (M=10.5) and tobacco only users (M=10.7). Women showed more depressive symptoms (M=10.3) than men. Results point out the need for early detection and intervention, and for more monitoring strategies to develop actions for reducing alcohol and tobacco use in this population and, eventually, depressive outcomes.

La depresión es un malestar emocional que trastoca la esfera psicoafectiva y se asocia con distintas conductas de riesgo como el consumo de alcohol y de tabaco, particularmente en la población joven. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar las diferencias que existen respecto a la depresión en cuatro grupos de adolescentes (1. consumidores de alcohol, 2. consumidores de tabaco, 3. no consumidores de alcohol ni de tabaco y 4. consumidores de alcohol y tabaco) estudiantes de Bachillerato o Licenciatura. Se realizó un censo con 116 214 estudiantes, con un promedio de edad, en nivel medio superior, de 15 años y de 19 años en nivel superior. El consumo elevado fue más frecuente en los hombres de ambos niveles educativos. Se hizo un análisis de varianza (ANOVA) factorial para determinar las diferencias en la sintomatologia depresiva entre aquéllos que presentaban consumo elevado de alcohol (cuatro o más copas por ocasión) y de tabaco (cuatro o más cigarrillos al dia) por nivel educativo y sexo. Se encontró sintomatologia depresiva más elevada en los estudiantes de nivel superior (M=9.7), en contraste con los jóvenes de medio superior (M=9.5) (p<0.05). Al comparar la sintomatologia depresiva entre los grupos de consumo, los resultados indicaron mayores puntajes en el grupo de consumidores de alcohol y tabaco (M=11.3), seguidos de usuarios excesivos de tabaco solamente (M=10.7) y de alcohol solamente (M=10.5). Las mujeres de ambos niveles educativos presentaron una mayor sintomatologia depresiva (M=10.3), seguidas de los hombres de nivel superior (M=9) y los hombres de nivel medio superior (M=8.8). Los resultados favorecen el desarrollo de acciones de detección e intervención temprana y el monitoreo de esta población.

Confiabilidad y validez de la escala de depresión CES-D en un censo de estudiantes de nivel medio superior y superior, en la Ciudad de México / Reliability and validity of the depression scale CES-D in high school and college students from Mexico city: Results from a census

Introduction Depression and its symptoms are becoming one of the most important health problems worldwide. The impact of depression on the productive life of people, and the burden it represents because of its co-morbidity, is growing. Some authors estimate that depression is the second cause for the global loss of years of healthy life and the first one in developed countries. An increasing proportion of teenage population has mental health issues. Depression and its symptoms are among the most common, but they are not an epidemic problem yet, although spread enough as to maintain interest in its current impact and in its negative consequences over individual health. Depression has a prominent place among mood disorders in Mexico (4.5%), and women are who mostly suffer it (5.8%), which has remained consistent over time. Different difficult situations occur during adolescence along with depression, depressive mood, and depressive symptoms. This situation may be related to changes and processes that occur during this period when individuals cope with situations they cannot handle, which in turn become stressful. Therefore, it is necessary to study and to work with adolescents in order to be able to differentiate affective, cognitive, somatic, and behavioral expressions, which are proper to this stage, from those possibly caused by an illness that could have negative consequences. Adolescent depression influences mood and the way individuals live unpleasant or annoying experiences, thus it affects almost every aspect of life and becomes a risk factor for psychiatric and behavioral problems. However, there are some areas that need more research, for example: the specific characteristics and expressions of the problem including gender comparisons and using designs with special groups. Data show that depression is growing in adolescents; therefore it is a priority to work on detection and prevention to reduce its impact on mental health and to develop cost-effective intervention strategies. One way to do this is using valid-reliable screening tools because they are cheap, and methodologically-logistically useful. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) has been used in different studies with Mexican adolescents, and has proven to have good psychometric characteristics. The CES-D has never been used with an entire population in a great scale study. The objective of this paper is to measure the validity and reliability of the scale (construct, concurrent, and external validity, as well as internal consistency) in a population of high school and college freshman students from Mexico City. Method Design. The study was a census made with high school and college freshman students during 2009. Data were collected in 22 schools. Population. A sample of 58568 students participated in the census. The mean age was 1 7 years old (±2.7). Most of the students lived in homes with one to four other persons at the moment of the study (55.4%); 86% said that only their father worked at that moment, and 59.4 said that only the mother; 79.7% of the students lived with both parents, and 1 7.9% only with their mother; 57403 students (98.0% of the population) completed the CES-D in the age range of 14-24 years: 27264 (47.5%) men, and 30139 (52.5%) women. Instrument. The Automated Medical Examination (Examen Médico Automatizado-EMA) is a diagnostic questionnaire designed by the General Directorate of Medical Services (Dirección General de Servicios Médicos) of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). It is a questionnaire with four self-report forms that collect information about the physical and mental health, the family, and the general context of every student. This information is used to create a diagnosis of vulnerability and a predictive profile for developing prevention programs, as well as research protocols that help in promoting a culture for health care. The CES-D was included for the measurement in 2009. Results Overall internal consistency was adequate (α=.83). Internal consistency was tested by sex; the coefficient was higher for women (α=.84). Factor analysis generated a four-factor solution (explained variance 54.1%); each factor had good internal consistency and theoretical agreement. The scale showed a significant discriminative power for opposite scores (z=-l44.121, p<.001), and a positive significant correlation with the Okasha Suicidality Scale (rΦ=.325, p = .000). A cut-off point of 16 or higher was established to identify students with high depressive symptomatology. 14.7% of the participants in this study had high depressive symptomatology (11.1% men, 1 7.9% women). Conclusions The CES-D is a valid and reliable epidemiological instrument for different populations. Since depression is a complex and dynamic phenomenon, it is important to evaluate the psychometric properties of any instrument used to measure it. The results of this study showed that the CES-D maintains its internal consistency as well as good concurrent-external validity. Coefficients are higher for women and they increase with age; thus, it would be necessary to refine some aspects to measure younger subjects in a more consistent manner. The data proved that CES-D is a useful instrument for distinguishing different levels of depressive symptomatology; this is relevant because the scale is often used in collective contexts, allowing systematic monitoring of depression with good cost-effective results. Monitoring is also important to keep acceptable levels of emotional wellbeing in student population. Development and refinement of instruments such as the CES-D would potentially lead to opportune and reliable detection of adolescents who may be at risk for suffering mental health problems. This would facilitate implementing more stable and continuous prevention and attention programs to reduce the negative impact of depression in the short term.

Introducción La depresión y sus manifestaciones sintomatológicas son parte de los principales problemas de salud entre la población mundial y su impacto en la vida productiva ha aumentado con respecto a otras enfermedades. En México, esta tendencia y sus consecuencias negativas en el desarrollo hacia la adultez justifican la necesidad de atenderla y prevenirla. A través de instrumentos de tamizaje válidos y confiables como la Escala de Depresión del Centro de Estudios Epidemiológicos [Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression Scale: CES-D) diseñada en 1977 por Radloff, ha sido posible detectar posibles casos clínicos de depresión en diversos estudios con adolescentes escolares. Sin embargo, hasta ahora no se había documentado su comportamiento en una población de estudiantes a gran escala. Método El levantamiento de la información se realizó en agosto de 2009, previo al inicio del ciclo escolar. Se obtuvo información de 57403 alumnos, de los cuales 47.5% fueron hombres y 52.5% mujeres, con una edad promedio de 17 años (±2.7). Instrumento. La CES-D se incorporó en los formatos del Examen Médico Automatizado (EMA) quese utilizaron para realizar el levantamiento censal entre los alumnos de nuevo ingreso a bachillerato o licenciatura. Resultados Consistencia inferna y validez de constructo. La consistencia interna de la escala global mostró un índice satisfactorio (α=0.83). Los índices de contabilidad fueron adecuados para todos los grupos de edad. El análisis factorial con extracción de componentes principales y rotación oblicua arrojó una estructura de cuatro factores con valores Eigen mayores a uno, que explican 54.1% de la varianza; los coeficientes de consistencia interna y concordancia teórica resultaron satisfactorios: Afecto deprimido, Afecto positivo, Somatización e Interpersonal (como un indicador integrado por sólo dos reactivos). Validez concurrente por medio de grupos contrastados. En la prueba de grupos contrastados se compararon los puntajes globales de la CES-D que se situaron por debajo del percent i I 25 versus aquéllos por arriba del percentil 75. Se utilizó una comparación de promedios de Mann-Whitney, que mostró diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los cuartiles contrastados (z = -144.121, p<.001). Validez externa. Se analizó mediante su asociación con la Escala de Expectativas de Vivir-Morir de Okasha (que también se aplica en el EMA), obteniendo una correlación positiva y significativa entre quienes tuvieron sintomatología depresiva elevada y quienes manifestaron deseos de morir (rΦ, = 0.325, p = .000). Detección de sintomatología depresiva elevada. La definición operacional de la sintomatología depresiva elevada se definió con el punto de corte (PC) de la CES-D con base en la media más una desviación estándar (PC> 1 6) con lo que se detectó una frecuencia de sintomatología depresiva elevada de 14.7% (n = 8,197): 11.1% en varones y 1 7.9% en mujeres. Conclusiones Los resultados muestran que en poblaciones tan grandes como la del presente estudio, la CES-D es una herramienta útil y adecuada, breve y fácil de aplicar y analizar para establecer un monitoreo que dé respuesta a una de las necesidades más apremiantes en la población escolar: la detección de la sintomatología depresiva elevada como un aspecto importante del malestar emocional. Sirve, además, para determinar la magnitud de la problemática y arribar a su prevención y, de ser el caso, instrumentar acciones para su tratamiento. La relevancia de los resultados obtenidos radica en que se trata de población escolar que puede llegar a requerir atención y prevención oportunas en salud mental en etapas tempranas de la enfermedad, incluso antes de la confirmación diagnóstica en los servicios especializados. Esta detección deriva en beneficios para la población escolar y en estrategias funcionales de atención adecuada y costo-efectivas.

El consumo riesgoso y dañino de alcohol y sus factores predictivos en adolescentes estudiantes del bachillerato / Hazardous and harmful drinking among Mexican adolescents: prevalence and predictive factors

Alcohol is commonly used among adolescents in Mexico. In a representative survey of Mexico's general population, 30% of the teenagers reported current drinking, whereas 8% incurred in binge drinking (5 or more drinks per occasion) at least once during the last year. In addition, 3% reported three or more alcohol dependence symptoms over the last 12 months. In this Mexican age group, alcohol consumption importantly contributes to the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality (e.g. accidents, violence, homicides, suicide and risky behaviors). Data from a representative survey of adolescents attending middle and high school in Mexico City suggests that adolescents attending Mexico's schools run a high risk for alcohol problems. In this study, prevalence of lifetime and current drinking, and of current binge drinking (5 or more drinks per occasion) were, respectively, 65.8%, 35.2%, and 23.8%. These rates are substantially higher than those described in teenagers from Mexico's general population. Furthermore, although among Mexico's general population the prevalence of drinking has traditionally been higher among male than female adolescents, no gender differences in prevalence of alcohol consumption have been reported among Mexican middle and high school students. This suggests that female adolescents in Mexico's schools have become equally exposed to drinking as their male counterparts. Despite these trends, there is a paucity of studies examining drinking patterns and their respective correlates among Mexican adolescents attending post-elementary education. To our knowledge, in this population, there are no published prevalence estimates of Hazardous and Harmful Drinking (HHD). HHD is defined as a pattern of alcohol consumption conferring to the individual a greater risk for health problems, or frankly conducive to medical or psychological complications (e.g. accidents, victimization, violence, alcohol dependence, liver cirrhosis and/or other medical complications). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), developed by the World Health Organization, is currently the only instrument specifically designed to identify HHD. Although the AUDIT was initially validated only among adult patients in primary care settings, this instrument has consistently shown to be valid and reliable in detecting alcohol problems in different populations, such as the adolescent population in many countries around the world. Given the public health implications of estimating the frequency of HHD among adolescents attending high school in Mexico, and given the importance of elucidating the variables influencing this problem, we decided to conduct the analysis presented here. To our knowledge, this is the first report published in the international literature on the prevalence of HHD among adolescents attending high school in a Latin American country. Objective In the study described here, derived from a Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) project entitled <>, we aimed at examining the frequency and risk factors for HHD among Mexican high school students. More specifically, our objectives were: 1. to determine the past-year prevalence of HHD among high school freshmen; and 2. to examine, in this population, the effects of demographic and family variables in the likelihood of HHD. Subjects and methods This study was a cross-sectional survey conducted at the beginning of the school year during the registration period between September 1st and September 30th, 2005. In 2005, a total of 34000 students were accepted to initiate college at the nine UNAM college campuses located in the Mexico City metropolitan area. Of these, 28784 students (87.4 %) (age=14.8 [±2.5] years; 51.0% women) consented in answering the survey and provided complete data. Consequently, 521 6 students (12.6%) were excluded from the analysis due to a lack of consent, incomplete data or their absence at the time of registration. We used the AUDIT to examine past-year prevalence of HHD. This self-report instrument includes 10 items that examine frequency and intensity of drinking (items 1-3), presence of alcohol dependence symptoms (items 4-6), and negative consequences of drinking (items 7-10), yielding a maximum possible score of 40 points. Among adult patients in primary care settings, it has been accepted that an AUDIT score of 0-7 points reflects safe levels of alcohol consumption, whereas a score of 8 points or higher indicates the presence of Hazardous and/or Harmful Drinking. It has been described however, that among adolescents, an AUDIT score of 3 points or higher reliably identifies those students experiencing this problem. In the analysis presented here, we separately examined and reported prevalence estimates and correlates for HHD using both AUDIT's cut-off scores (≥3 and ≥8). The AUDIT was administered at the same time that a wellness screening survey that the UNAM Medical Services routinely administer to all registering high school freshmen at the beginning of the school year. Questions in the wellness survey pertained students' medical and dental health, family medical history, immunizations, and use of tobacco and other drugs. In addition, demographic and socioeconomic information was obtained from a questionnaire also routinely administered by the UNAM registrar's office. This questionnaire included 37 items inquiring about gender, age, employment and marital status, monthly family income, parental education, place and type of residency, persons with whom the student resided, and questions on previous academic performance. We estimated the prevalence of HHD and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in the total of the sample, and separately by age group, gender, working status, monthly family income, parental education, and by variables reflecting whether the students lived with their family, peers, or alone. These variables were modeled using simulated binary terms (0, 1). Subsequently, a multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between HHD and the demographic and socioeconomic variables listed above. Variables were entered simultaneously into the logistic regression equation. To summarize the level of risk of HHD conferred by significant variables in the logistic regression model, odds ratios (OR) and their respective 95% CI's were estimated. All the significant effects reported here were adjusted considering the effects of the remaining demographic and socioeconomic variables. Results Among the high school students examined here, the prevalence of HHD was 4.0% when an AUDIT cut-off score of ≥ 8 was used. When an AUDIT score of ≥3 was considered, a frequency of 1 7.2% was observed. Men (AUDIT ≥8: 5.4%; AUDIT ≥3: 21.4%) experienced this problem more frequently than women (AUDIT≥8: 2.6%; AUDIT≥3: 13.1%). The highest prevalence of HHD among men was observed in all age groups and regardless of working status, family income, parents' education, or regardless of the persons with whom the student reported to live with. Controlling for demographic and socioeconomic differences between men and women, we found that the risk of experiencing HHD among men was approximately two times higher than among women (OR's and 95% CI's for AUDIT's cut-off score ≥8 or ≥3, respectively 2.0[1.6-2.4] and 1.6[1.5-1.8]).

De acuerdo a la Encuesta Nacional de Adicciones (ENA) (Medina-Mora et al., 2003), de 1990 al 2002, la prevalencia en el consumo de alcohol durante los últimos 12 meses entre los jóvenes mexicanos de 12 a 17 años de edad, se elevó del 27.6% al 30%. De manera más reciente, la Encuesta de Estudiantes de Nivel Medio y Medio Superior de la Ciudad de México (EENMMS) (Villatoro et al., 2003), describió que el consumo alguna vez en la vida y el consumo durante el último mes de bebidas etílicas afectó respectivamente al 65.8% y al 35.2% de los estudiantes. Llama la atención que la frecuencia del consumo alguna vez en la vida reportada por la EENMMS es considerablemente mayor que la descrita en los adolescentes de la población general urbana (39.8%) por la ENA. Además, las diferencias de género reportadas por la ENA, en las que los hombres tradicionalmente beben con más frecuencia que las mujeres, no fueron encontradas por la EENMMS en la población estudiantil del nivel medio y medio superior. Hasta lo que nosotros sabemos, se desconoce cuál es la prevalencia en esta población de patrones de consumo problemático de alcohol como serían el consumo riesgoso y dañino (CRDA) o el consumo dependiente. Por lo que se desconoce si existen diferencias entre la población estudiantil y los adolescentes de la población general, en la prevalencia de estos problemas. El CRDA se define como un patrón de consumo de bebidas embriagantes, que se sitúa en un continuum de severidad, que coloca al sujeto en riesgo de desarrollar problemas de salud y/o que puede desembocar en francas complicaciones físicas y/o psicológicas (accidentes, victimización, violencia, dependencia al alcohol, etc.). Objetivo En el estudio que se presenta aquí, nos propusimos: 1) estimar la prevalencia durante el último año del CRDA en los estudiantes de primer ingreso al nivel bachillerato de la UNAM, y 2) evaluar la influencia de las variables sociodemográficas y familiares en el riesgo para el CRDA. Material y métodos El diseño del estudio fue el de una encuesta transversal en los estudiantes del primer año del bachillerato en el sistema escolarizado de la UNAM. Se estudiaron a 28 784 estudiantes (87.4 % de la población total). Se utilizó el Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) -versión en español para detectar el CRDA en la población adolescente. En este análisis empleamos tanto los puntos de corte recomendados para evaluar el CRDA en adultos (AUDIT≥8) como el puntaje recomendado para la población adolescente (AUDIT≥3). Se utilizaron porcentajes, promedios y desviaciones estándar para el análisis de las variables demográficas, y pruebas de contraste de medias (análisis de varianza) y de proporciones ( χ²) de acuerdo a la variable. Se utilizó la regresión logística multinomial para examinar la asociación de las variables demográficas y familiares con el CRDA. Se calcularon los odds ratios (OR) con intervalo de confianza al 95% para resumir el nivel de riesgo de ser afectado por el CRDA. Resultados Cuando se usó la definición del CRDA para la población adulta, se encontró que 4.0% de los estudiantes lo presentaron, frente a 1 7.2% cuando se utilizó el puntaje del AUDIT recomendado para los adolescentes. El riesgo de experimentar el CRDA fue casi dos veces mayor en los hombres que en las mujeres.

Prevalencia del consumo riesgoso y dañino de alcohol y factores de riesgo en estudiantes universitarios de primer ingreso / Prevalence of risky and harmful alcohol consumption and risk factors in freshmen students

Background In Mexico, alcohol is the most widely used substance among young adults. Alcohol consumption in this age group contributes importantly to the most frequent causes of mortality and morbidity (e.g., accidents, violence, homicides, suicide and risky behaviors). Around the world, college or university attendance has emerged in the literature as a risk factor for drinking problems among young adults. In Mexico, data from the most recent National Survey on Addictions showed that lifetime and current drinking is experienced by more than half of the Mexicans attending college education. Despite this, in our country there is a paucity of epidemiological studies examining drinking behavior and correlates among those attending college. Findings in non-representative samples of students attending public and private universities in Mexico City suggest that, during the last two decades, there has been an increase in the frequency of lifetime and current drinking in this population. Additionally, these studies have shown that, in comparison to young adults of the same age in the general population, university students may experience a greater prevalence of lifetime and current alcohol drinking. Regarding the frequency of unhealthy drinking among Mexican college students, to our knowledge there are no prevalence estimates of hazardous or harmful drinking published. However, observations in non-random samples of university students in Mexico City suggested that at least one in three men and one in five women incurred in unhealthy drinking (e.g., ≥ 5 drinks per occasion or drinking to intoxication) at least once during the last month. Hazardous and harmful drinking is respectively defined by a pattern of alcohol consumption conferring a greater risk for health problems or that is frankly conducive to medical or psychological complications (e.g., accidents, victimization, violence, alcohol dependence, liver cirrhosis and/or other medical complications). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), developed by the World Health Organization, is currently the only instrument specifically designed to identify hazardous and harmful drinking. Although the AUDIT was initially validated among older adult patients in primary care settings, this instrument has consistently shown to be valid and reliable in detecting alcohol problems in different populations such as the college students in many countries around the world. Given the public health implications of estimating the frequency of hazardous and harmful drinking among college students in Mexico, and given the importance of elucidating the variables influencing this problem, we decided to conduct the present study. To our knowledge, this is the first report published in the international literature on the prevalence of hazardous and harmful drinking among college students in a Latin American country. Objective In the analysis described here, derived from the project entitled Early Identification and Treatment of Problem Drinkers at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), our aim was to examine the frequency and risk factors for hazardous and harmful drinking among Mexican university students. More specifically, our objectives were: 1. To determine the past-year prevalence of hazardous and harmful drinking among UNAM college freshmen; and 2. To examine in this population the effects of demographic and family variables on the likelihood of hazardous and harmful drinking. Subjects and methods This study was a cross-sectional survey that was conducted at the beginning of the school year during the registration period between September 1st and September 30th, 2005. In 2005, a total of 34 000 students were accepted to initiate college at the nine UNAM college campuses located in the Mexico City metropolitan area. Of these, 24 921 (73.3%) students (age=18.7±4.3 years; 55.7% women) consented in answering the survey and provided complete data. Consequently, 9 079 students (26.7%) were excluded from the analysis due to lack of consent, incomplete data or due to their absence at the time of registration. We used the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) to examine past-year prevalence of hazardous and harmful drinking. This self-report instrument includes 10 items that examine frequency and intensity of drinking (items 1-3), presence of alcohol dependence symptoms (items 4-6) and negative consequences of drinking (items 7-10), yielding a maximum possible score of 40 points. Among adult patients in primary care settings, it has been accepted that an AUDIT score of 0-7 points reflects safe levels of alcohol consumption, whereas a score of 8 points or greater indicates the presence of hazardous and harmful drinking. It has been described, however, that among college students, an AUDIT score of 6 points or greater reliably identifies those students experiencing this problem. In the analysis presented here, we separately examined and reported the prevalence estimates and correlates of hazardous and harmful drinking using both AUDIT cut-off scores (≥ 6 and ≥ 8). The AUDIT was administered at the same time as a wellness screening survey that the UNAM Medical Services routinely administer to all registering freshmen at the beginning of the school year. Questions in the wellness survey pertained students' medical and dental health, family medical history, immunizations, use of tobacco and other drugs. In addition, demographic and socioeconomic information was obtained from a questionnaire also routinely administered by the UNAM registrar's office. This questionnaire included 37 items inquiring about gender, age, employment and marital status, monthly family income, parental education, place and type of residency, persons with whom the student resided, and questions on previous academic performance.

Antecedentes En México, el alcohol es la sustancia potencialmente adictiva que se utiliza con mayor frecuencia por los adultos jóvenes. Información proveniente de la Encuesta Nacional de Adicciones más reciente muestra que más de 50% de los jóvenes entre los 18-29 años ha consumido bebidas alcohólicas al menos una vez durante el último mes. En la Ciudad de México se ha encontrado que más de la mitad de las mujeres y cerca de dos terceras partes de los hombres entre 18-29 años de edad consume regularmente bebidas alcohólicas. Durante los últimos años, el consumo de bebidas alcohólicas se ha venido incrementando importantemente entre los jóvenes mexicanos de ambos sexos en edad de recibir una educación superior. A nivel internacional, la bibliografía sugiere que la población estudiantil de los centros de educación superior es un grupo de mayor riesgo para el desarrollo de problemas por consumo de alcohol. En México, aunque se desconoce si los estudiantes de educación superior son un grupo de mayor riesgo para estos abusos, algunas encuestas y reportes sugieren que los problemas por consumo de alcohol tienen una importancia creciente. En cuanto al consumo de alcohol que excede los niveles seguros para la salud (≥2 bebidas estándar al día en las mujeres o ≥3 bebidas estándar al día en los hombres), el Observatorio Mexicano del Alcohol y Drogas describió que en el año 2002 el consumo de cinco o más copas por ocasión de consumo afecta a tres de cinco hombres y a una de cinco mujeres. Aunque problemas metodológicos y sesgos de selección potenciales en estas encuestas dificultan su interpretación, sus resultados sugieren que el consumo de alcohol, particularmente el consumo riesgoso y potencialmente dañino, es común entre los estudiantes universitarios de la Ciudad de México. El consumo riesgoso y dañino de alcohol (CRDA) se sitúa en un continuum de severidad y se define como un patrón de consumo de bebidas embriagantes que colocan al sujeto en riesgo de desarrollar problemas de salud y/o que desemboca en francas complicaciones físicas y/o psicológicas (accidentes, victimización, violencia, dependencia al alcohol, cirrosis hepática, etc.). De acuerdo a los reportes de la bibliografía internacional, este es el primer estudio publicado sobre la prevalencia de consumo peligroso y dañino de alcohol en estudiantes universitarios en América Latina. Objetivo En el trabajo que se presenta aquí, que forma parte del proyecto para la Identificación Temprana y Tratamiento Oportuno de bebedores con Consumo Excesivo de Alcohol en Estudiantes Universitarios de la UNAM, nos propusimos evaluar la prevalencia del CRDA durante el último año y examinar los factores de riesgo y protección respectivos en estudiantes de primer ingreso a la licenciatura de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. De manera especifica, nos propusimos: 1) estimar la prevalencia del CRDA durante el último año en los estudiantes de primer ingreso a la licenciatura de la UNAM, y 2) evaluar en esta población la influencia de las variables sociodemográficas y familiares en el riesgo para el CRDA. Material y métodos Se trató de un estudio transversal en el que se estudiaron 24921 estudiantes del primer año de la licenciatura de la UNAM (edad=18.7±4.3 años; 55% mujeres). Para detectar aquellos estudiantes que en el último año incurrieron en el CRDA, se utilizó el instrumento de tamizaje Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT). Se utilizó la regresión logística multinomial para examinar los efectos de las variables demográficas y sociofamiliares, así como para calcular Odds Ratios (OR) y sus respectivos intervalos de confianza al 95%. Este instrumento consiste de 10 preguntas que exploran la frecuencia e intensidad del consumo de bebidas alcohólicas. Con el objetivo de poder comparar nuestros hallazgos con los de otros investigadores, se examinaron y se reportan separadamente las prevalencias del CRDA con base en puntos de corte de 8 y de 6 en el AUDIT. Para el reporte de datos demográficos y puntajes del AUDIT, se utilizaron porcentajes, promedios y desviaciones estándar. Se emplearon las pruebas de contraste de medias (análisis de varianza) y de proporciones (χ2) dependiendo de la naturaleza de cada variable. Se calcularon las prevalencias del CRDA con sus respectivos intervalos de confianza al 95%. Resultados Usando un puntaje de corte en el AUDIT de ocho y de seis puntos, la prevalencia del CRDA durante el último año fue respectivamente de 11.1% y de 18.4%. Esta fue mayor en los hombres (AUDIT≥8: 17.3%; AUDIT≥6: 27.4%) que en las mujeres (AUDIT≥8: 6.2%; AUDIT≥6: 11.3%). Además del sexo masculino, aquellos estudiantes que trabajaban y que reportaron un mayor ingreso familiar mensual, tuvieron un mayor riesgo de experimentar el CRDA. En las mujeres, pero no en los hombres, un mayor nivel educativo tanto en el padre como en la madre también se relacionó con un incremento en el CRDA. Contrariamente, una mayor edad y el ser casado se asoció con una reducción en el riesgo del CRDA.

Aprender de lo sucedido: análisis de las quejas presentadas ante la Comisión Nacional Arbitraje Médico / Learning from experience: user's dissatisfaction with health services through claims brought to Conamed

Objetivos. Describir las quejas por insatisfacción con los servicios médicos que se presentaron ante la Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico (Conamed), en 1997 y 1998, procedentes de México, Distrito Federal. También, conocer qué aspectos de la calidad de la atención aparecen como deficientes, según las instituciones, las especialidades y algunas características de los quejosos. Material y métodos. Se estudiaron 1 925 quejas y se sistematizó la información para su análisis cuantitativo. Se aplicó la prueba ji cuadrada (c2) de Pearson para muestras independientes y un análisis de conglomerados. Resultados. Las quejas, principalmente, son relativas al tratamiento, las intervenciones quirúrgicas y el diagnóstico. Para cada una de las instituciones involucradas se distingue si las quejas se refieren a la estructura, al proceso o al resultado de la atención. Los tipos de conflictos difieren según el sexo, la edad y nivel socioeconómico de las personas. Conclusiones. Las quejas llevadas ante la Conamed aportan elementos sobre la satisfacción de los usuarios y la calidad de la atención; nuestros resultados son consistentes con los resultados de otros trabajos previos que han estudiado la satisfacción de los usuarios y la calidad de la atención. El texto completo en inglés de este artículo está disponible en: http://www.insp.mx/salud/index.html